![]() Commentary by Prakasan Kappoth |
October 18, 2008
|
|
Evolution of Browsers and Google Chrome – TRIZing it |
|
|
Couple of years back I was explaining the Ideal Final Result (IFR) concept to our engineers (Computer engineers) using the example of "search". The question we tried to answer; what is the IFR for the function (for consumers) search. Since then I was intrigued by the potential possibilities in the human-computer interaction aspect of one of the most active phenomena on the internet, and search was always a fascinating topic to sell TRIZ concept to computer engineers. Recently Google released their browser (Chrome); before I wanted to install it myself and reading some of the fine prints about Chrome, the concept of IFR with "search" struck me queerly. Before I analyze why, let me try to describe some of the IFR's we used to fantasize about. In TRIZ Ideal Final Result means achieving the maximum functionality without any harm and increasing the overall cost (significantly). I assume the cost of developing a browser for Google should not be expensive considering the 20% time given to engineers doing something their own! What is the Ideal Final Result for us in the "search" function? - We never want to search if we know everything – This one is beyond the science fiction indeed. A search engine does my actual work –I'm writing a research paper on cognitive thinking and emotions, and the moment I hit on the search, I may get the results related to the topic I'm searching, and search engine recommends an extra paragraph. (Hmmm...This is a cool feature for me to finish some pending articles…) The list can go on: When Google announced their browser Chrome last week, the immediate connection made was – "Search" and "browser", as in a function diagram interacting each other. Naturally, it is pretty evident why Google should develop own browser and enter this market, which is a very competitive from the era of Netscape, and also having partnered with Firefox supporting their browser for sometime. They may have nicely packaged about their browser capabilities, (I must admit some of them are unique though), however, that doesn't give their browser an edge on what's there already, especially FireFox or Safari for a common user like me. Illustrating the entire thought process behind launching a browser, what I believe Google's attempt to bring a browser is nothing more than to implement the next generation search feature, indeed a very innovative thinking and an innovative way to achieve the same via their own browser. Few Ideal Final Result's we discussed above has been implemented in some part of the world, not necessarily specific to the search, but in similar context. Product like Autonomy is already providing intelligence searching, but with a limited knowledge base (internal to the organization). However, bringing intelligence to the search for the mass, like the way Google excelled in the search engine isn't very easy with a restricted user and knowledge base. How could Google fill this gap? A dedicated browser for using their own search engine should help them understanding the usage pattern, context in which we search etc and add some brain. Browser as an application running in my own PC, can facilitate more actions, record/log the instances, situations, applications I'm running and more to understand me as a user. Here is a classic (?) feature: When I search for the latest movie and book a ticket through online booking site, my search engine knows that and records it; after few days, I'm enjoying some music on my PC and suddenly remembers this movie I watched and want to check out the option to buy some music and open the browser to search. Bingo, there comes your browser and tells you, dude – here is the best site to purchase this song rated best by your friends (remember I also use my social network) from the movie you watched last week! Incidentally, they have amended some of the clause mentioned in the copyright license, but still I believe they are on to something. Let's wait and watch. |
|
Comments [4] | Permalink |
|
| Categories: Buzz/Press, General, Methodology | |
|
|
| posted by Ellen Domb [ http://www.trizpqrgroup.com ] | October 18, 2008 at 8:33 pm |
Hello, Prakash--Congratulations on your Commentary! Please upload a picture so we can see you as well as read your opinions. (Or a creative picture???) Thanks for the Chrome discussion--I read the fine print and didn't download it. HOw about a follow-up column in a few months after you've used it for a while, with a TRIZ perspective? |
|
| posted by Katie Barry | October 20, 2008 at 0:53 am |
Prakash's bio is up! There is a link for his biography next to his name. His photograph is coming soon - |
|
| posted by Prakash | October 20, 2008 at 3:06 am |
Thanks, Ellen & Katie. Certainly. There are several Chrome features I guess very relevant for one to understand TRIZ for software. |
|
| posted by Prashant [ http://prashantinnofuture.blogspot.com/ ] | October 31, 2008 at 7:49 am |
Hey Prakash, Congrats!!!!!!!!! Waiting to hear more & more from you. Keep it up! Regards, Prashant |
|


