The TRIZ JournalCelebrating 10 Years On The Web
Part of the RealInnovation Network
AIT Group - Competitive Strategy and Innovation Inventioneering - Innovation is in our DNA Valeocon Management Consultants - Value Innovation Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
Home  >  Real Innovation Commentary
Search:
  • Subscribe
  • What is TRIZ?
  • Contradiction Matrix
    & 40 Principles
  • Archives
  • Best Practices
    • General
    • Software, Innovation and Creativity
    • Consultants, Innovation and Creativity
  • Call For Papers
  • Dictionary
  • Events Calendar
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Discussion Forum
  • Related Topics
  • Business Process Mgt
  • Innovation
  • Outsourcing
  • Six Sigma
  • Quick Access
  • Help
  • Search
  • Advertising
  • Article Archive
  • Newsletter Archive
  • Reader Feedback
  • Editorial Panel
Cass Pursell

Commentary by Cass Pursell

Email and RSSSubscribe via Email or RSS   |   Cass Pursell's Biography Biography
September 29, 2007
Print | Email

I'm Not Saying Executives Can Be Stubborn, But...

Here’s an anecdote I came across recently that reminded me of why many businesses I’ve been involved with have trouble successfully implementing their innovation intentions. On Thursday, September 4, 1862, Lee’s army was headed north, crossing the Potomac. A bottleneck developed in midstream when a wagon train became entangled. Stonewall Jackson’s quartermaster, Major John Harman, got the train moving again with a spectacular exhibition of profanity. The pious Jackson reprimanded Harman for his profanity, then smiled and accepted his explanation : “There’s only one language that will make a mule understand on a hot day that they must get out of the water.”

Many executives would like to speed up their innovation programs, but trying to convince them that in order to speed up, they must slow down the flow of projects that they allow to pour into their innovation process pipelines can be like talking a mule out of the water on a hot day. I can’t say that I’ve tried Harman’s method - profanity-laced tirades tend to be frowned upon in most professional settings - but I have tried math, and that seems to work fairly well.

The logic and empirical evidence supporting the use of the Law of Lead Time is difficult for anyone who respects data-based argument to resist. The fact is, there is a simple linear relationship between the number of active development projects and how long it takes to get any given project done. In other words, the more projects you have in the innovation process pipeline, the longer ALL projects will take. The converse is demonstrably true as well - the fewer active projects you have, the faster the innovation process can flow.

By using the Law of Lead Time, decision-makers can use data to drive the prioritization of proposed projects and speed up the innovation process flow. The idea is to get the organization thinking in terms of which projects to launch and which projects to remove from the pipeline in order to attain the given innovation process lead time required for market success. If you can do that, you can avoid bottle-necking your innovation process and begin to build a competitive advantage around speed to market.

Comments [0] | Permalink
Categories: General

COMMENTARY COMMENT
ADD A COMMENT
ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 3 and 4 below:
 
 
 
RECENT ENTRIES
RSS
  • A Vote for Process Innovation
  • Structure is a Good Thing
  • You Measure What Matters
  • The Decline of the Corporate Lab Rat?
  • Where's My Return on Innovation?!
  • Wal Mart Saves the World

LATEST COMMENTS
  • The Customer-Centered Innovation Map by Ellen Domb
  • All Solutions Are Not Equal by Ellen Domb
  • Teaching Innovation by mike Lafond
  • The Customer-Centered Innovation Map by Navneet Bhushan
  • Dogwood in the Moonlight by Lynda Curtin
  • Dogwood in the Moonlight by Ellen Domb

COMMENTATORS
Katie Barry [39]  RSS Katie Barry's Biography
Ellen Domb [35]  RSS Ellen Domb's Biography
Praveen Gupta [34]  RSS Praveen Gupta's Biography
Michael S. Slocum [33]  RSS Michael S. Slocum's Biography
Cass Pursell [27]  RSS Cass Pursell's Biography
James Todhunter [16]  RSS James Todhunter's Biography
Jack Hipple [13]  RSS Jack Hipple's Biography
Michael Cyger [10]  RSS Michael Cyger's Biography
Lynda Curtin [7]  RSS Lynda Curtin's Biography
Bob Carter [4]  RSS Bob Carter's Biography
Guest Commentator [3]  RSS Guest Commentator's Biography
All Commentators

CATEGORIES
About Commentators [10]  RSS
Buzz/Press [38]  RSS
Companies [15]  RSS
Conference [37] RSS
General [94]  RSS
Leadership [4]  RSS
Management [44]  RSS
Methodology [61]  RSS
Strategy [60]  RSS

ARCHIVES
RSS
  

* Current Month
* Full Archive



Ad Links
Design for Six Sigma eLearning

TRIZ training, business & technical applications

Innovation programs from BMG

Business Innovation in the 21st Century (eBook)

Innovaton-TRIZ


Legal Information. © 2006 CTQ Media LLC. All rights reserved. v1.0, 0.1 Submit an Article • About The TRIZ Journal • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Site Map