The TRIZ JournalCelebrating 10 Years On The Web
Part of the RealInnovation Network
AIT Group - Competitive Strategy and Innovation Online Training from BMG University Valeocon Management Consultants - Value Innovation Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
Home  >  Real Innovation Commentary
Search:
  • Subscribe
  • What is TRIZ?
  • Contradiction Matrix
    & 40 Principles
  • Archives
  • Best Practices
    • General
    • Software, Innovation and Creativity
    • Consultants, Innovation and Creativity
  • Call For Papers
  • Dictionary
  • Events Calendar
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Discussion Forum
  • Related Topics
  • Business Process Mgt
  • Innovation
  • Outsourcing
  • Six Sigma
  • Quick Access
  • Help
  • Search
  • Advertising
  • Article Archive
  • Newsletter Archive
  • Reader Feedback
  • Editorial Panel
Jack Hipple

Commentary by Jack Hipple

Email and RSSSubscribe via Email or RSS   |   Jack Hipple's Biography Biography
October 27, 2008
Print | Email

The Tic-Tac-Toe Approach to Strategic Planning

I’d like to share with you a very simple, but powerful strategic analysis tool that I’ll just describe as the "tic-tac-toe" approach to strategic analysis. It comes from my experience with TRIZ, but it’s a much broader thinking tool and can greatly support your efforts to think strategically about innovation and where your organization is heading.

Put yourself, your product, or your business in the middle of the 9-Box diagram. Above you is the customer you supply. Underneath are your suppliers and the materials you buy. This box could easily be 12 or 15 boxes depending upon the depth of the supply chain and the steps involved in making your product or the needed raw materials needed for your product or service, but for simplicity we’ll just consider 9. To the left of your current box in the center is your past technology. To your right is the future. This same logic applies to the levels above and below you.

I propose that if you cannot complete in some detail all nine boxes, you do not know your business very well. Let’s look at a couple of simple illustrations. First the automobile. You are Ford, GM, or Toyota at the middle level. To your left is some aspect of previous car design, say windshield cleaning (note that we need to talk FUNCTION and not how it’s done). To the right might be the future of windshield cleaning and how it might be done (variable speed? responsive to auto speed? No wiper?). Above you is the integrated system, in the middle say, the car (of which the windshield is a part). Below you are the raw materials you buy to make a windshield wiper, say rubber strips. In the lower left is a description of a previous wiper raw material, say natural rubber (with little flexibility and a tendency to become brittle). To the right on the bottom are the materials envisioned for the next generation of wiper blades. In the upper left hand corner might be the car of the past with no wiper blades and to the right might be a windshield "cleaning system" (note I did not say wiper blades, I am describing the function needed and not how it’s done), possibly not requiring a wiper blade at all (think about how this might be done).

If you cannot complete all 9 boxes to some degree, you do not understand what is going on in your universe. The history of technology evolution clearly tells us that products and systems are integrated upward into their super-system. Said another way, your customer, despite what they might tell you, is trying to figure out how to get the function or value you provide without the use of your product or service.

If you are not thinking the same way, you are in for a rude awakening one of these days. Bank deposit systems that eliminate the need for deposit slips and envelopes are arriving. Want to be in the envelope business? Deposit slip printing business? Wouldn’t be a lot better to be in the optical scanning business rather than reducing the cost of envelopes? You’ve have heard the story of the buggy whip manufacturers who were making better buggy whips when the box above them moved to the right in one of these diagrams and better, cheaper buggy whips were irrelevant. The car provides a transportation service which is occasionally used to meet with other people. Maybe working on better Internet based communication systems is a smarter long term business, but that’s hard for GM and Ford to do, isn’t it?

To push a bit further, consider a cube and not a one dimensional diagram. Parallel ways of getting the same result. Cars are not the only way to get from here to there. Airplanes are another. If you make airfares low enough, who cares about the comfort factors of a car? Draw a simple tic-tac-toe diagram on a piece of paper and put your product or service in the middle box. To the left write in the past generation of this technology or service. To the right describe what you think future opportunities for improvement and development are. Now, one box below, write in a raw material or service you buy and use. While you are thinking about the path of evolution of this product or service, begin thinking about how your product or service could be performed without using it.

Now look at our customer above. What function does your product or service provide? Where is their product or service heading? How could they get the result they get with your product or service without you? What will their next generation need be? Do you have any idea how to provide?


Comments [3] | Permalink
Categories: Management, Methodology, Strategy

COMMENTARY COMMENT
ADD A COMMENT

posted by  Prakash October 30, 2008 at 2:21 am
Jack,

Very good illustration of 9Windows; it could have been nice to have a picture diagram here, although I don't know if it is feasible to add.

It is also important and contextual for one to look at the left windows (past) and right windows (future) from an immediate time scale perspective to understand the details of a working function. For E.g: Considering the windshield cleaning itself here. The left window could also be illustrated the immediate past, such as what initiates the function, and the future is what immediately after the function. This way, we can also use the 9 box diagram to see the system and state change of main function, sub-system or supporting function, and the super-system where the function belongs to..
 


posted by  shyam November 1, 2008 at 10:23 am
I agree with Prakash, Jack. A good illustration of the 9 windows.
@Prakash. To clarify your statemement , " The left window could also be illustrated the immediate past, such as what initiates the function, and the future is what immediately after the function" does it mean that the left window should denote what made the function a requirement and the the right window should denote the outcome achieved by the function? In the windshield example it would be left-rain water, dirt on the windshield and the right window would be "clean windshield". Am I getting it right? The objective now would be to get a "clean windshield, right?
 


posted by  Jack Hipple November 4, 2008 at 1:07 pm
The left to right is intended to mean the evolution of technology at that level, not a short time based analysis of the current process. To the left of the wiper box would be the evolution of materials used in the wiper blade (better elastomers, more resistance to cracking, better UV resistance). To the right would be potential improvements in these materials.

Above, left to right is the same thinking for the super-system in which the wipers are embedded (windshield cleaning system), such as shape of windshield and blades, curvature of blades, speed of blades, etc. Above that is the total car system in which the windshield cleaning system is embedded.

Hope that helps!
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 5 and 9 below:
 
 
 
RECENT ENTRIES
RSS
  • The 4400
  • Problem 1 vs. Problem 2
  • Vibrating Mascara
  • The Tic-Tac-Toe Approach to Strategic Planning
  • What's Your Sign (Of Innovation)?
  • What Business Are You In?

LATEST COMMENTS
  • Once More on Innovation Versus Transformation by James Todhunter
  • Once More on Innovation Versus Transformation by Ellen Domb
  • The 4400 by Jack Hipple
  • The 4400 by Prakash
  • Innovation Lessons From Italian Furniture Design by Scottsdale tile
  • Problem 1 vs. Problem 2 by shyam gopal

COMMENTATORS
Ellen Domb [54]  RSS Ellen Domb's Biography
Katie Barry [46]  RSS Katie Barry's Biography
Praveen Gupta [38]  RSS Praveen Gupta's Biography
Michael S. Slocum [33]  RSS Michael S. Slocum's Biography
Cass Pursell [29]  RSS Cass Pursell's Biography
Jack Hipple [21]  RSS Jack Hipple's Biography
James Todhunter [20]  RSS James Todhunter's Biography
Michael Cyger [10]  RSS Michael Cyger's Biography
Lynda Curtin [7]  RSS Lynda Curtin's Biography
Bob Carter [4]  RSS Bob Carter's Biography
Guest Commentator [4]  RSS Guest Commentator's Biography
Prakasan Kappoth [4]  RSS Prakasan Kappoth's Biography
All Commentators

CATEGORIES
About Commentators [11]  RSS
Buzz/Press [52]  RSS
Companies [21]  RSS
Conference [48] RSS
General [113]  RSS
Leadership [6]  RSS
Management [60]  RSS
Methodology [86]  RSS
Strategy [70]  RSS

ARCHIVES
RSS
  

* Current Month
* Full Archive



Ad Links
Executive Introduction to Innovation

TRIZ training, business & technical applications

iSixSigma Live! Save up to $700

Business Innovation in the 21st Century (eBook)

Innovaton-TRIZ


Legal Information. © 2006 CTQ Media. All rights reserved. v1.0, 0.1 Submit an Article • About The TRIZ Journal • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Site Map