The TRIZ JournalCelebrating 10 Years On The Web
Part of the RealInnovation Network
AIT Group - Competitive Strategy and Innovation Inventioneering - Innovation is in our DNA Valeocon Management Consultants - Value Innovation Click To Learn More About PremiumLinks
Home  >  Real Innovation Commentary
Search:
  • Subscribe
  • What is TRIZ?
  • Contradiction Matrix
    & 40 Principles
  • Archives
  • Best Practices
    • General
    • Software, Innovation and Creativity
    • Consultants, Innovation and Creativity
  • Call For Papers
  • Dictionary
  • Events Calendar
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Discussion Forum
  • Related Topics
  • Business Process Mgt
  • Innovation
  • Outsourcing
  • Six Sigma
  • Quick Access
  • Help
  • Search
  • Advertising
  • Article Archive
  • Newsletter Archive
  • Reader Feedback
  • Editorial Panel
Cass Pursell

Commentary by Cass Pursell

Email and RSSSubscribe via Email or RSS   |   Cass Pursell's Biography Biography
January 31, 2008
Print | Email

Where's My Return on Innovation?!

(Or, Is That a Canary in Your Coal Mine?)

The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), in partnership with BusinessWeek, conducted (from October 2006 through March 2007) its fourth annual survey of senior executives on innovation and the innovation-to-cash process.

Its key findings, released in August of last year, include some worrisome trends:

  • Innovation remains a top strategic focus for the majority of companies
  • 67% of respondents said that their companies would spend more on innovation then in years past
  • Just 46% of executives reported being satisfied with their return on innovation expenditures (down from 52% the year before)
So executives are not only focusing their organization’s attention on innovation programs and spending more on them, but are simultaneously less satisfied with the results of those programs. The dissatisfaction is not a one-year phenomenon, either. It’s been on a downward trend visible over the entire four years of the survey, and the level of dissatisfaction is increasing. It’s the kind of trend that bears watching, and taking seriously. If it continues, is it a stretch to imagine an innovation-backlash? How many executives, particularly in times of economic uncertainty, will be willing to throw good money after bad at a business approach that offers little visibility and unsatisfying returns?

So how can senior executives’ dissatisfaction with innovation programs be reduced? The survey identified a risk-averse culture, lengthy product-development times, and a lack of internal coordination as the three biggest stumbling blocks facing organizations seeking to improve their return on innovation, so these are obvious areas of focus. One other interesting finding was that the satisfaction with innovation payback was greatest among high-level executives whose primary organizational function is vision and strategy (CEOs, Chairmen, and company Presidents), who rated their satisfaction above 60%. Conversely, high-level executives whose primary organizational function is driving results (Chief Operating Officers, Chief Financial Officers) rated their satisfaction with innovation returns at less than 40%. This implies that the value of innovation programs may be heavily weighted by the program’s ability to sway perception of the organization in the marketplace, more than by their ability to produce bottom-line results year-in and year-out.

Comments [1] | Permalink
Categories: Buzz/Press, General

COMMENTARY COMMENT
ADD A COMMENT

posted by  Ellen Domb  [ http://www.trizpqrgroup.com ] February 1, 2008 at 11:52 am
The idea that it is the organizational perception, not the measured reality, that drives next year's budget, levels of commitment, and all those "sr. mangement support" intangibles is (possibly?) discouraging, but very realistic, from my observations. Many companies talk about measuring innovation, or benchmarking the few that do, but end up with a "we'll know it when we see it" attitude.

Which is more depressing to the non-senior managers in innovation:
1. Not measuring
2. Measuring, but not making decisions based on the measurements
 

ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

max characters : 1500

characters remaining :
remember me :
To help us prevent spam-generated submissions,
please enter the summation of 2 and 8 below:
 
 
 
RECENT ENTRIES
RSS
  • A Vote for Process Innovation
  • Structure is a Good Thing
  • You Measure What Matters
  • The Decline of the Corporate Lab Rat?
  • Where's My Return on Innovation?!
  • Wal Mart Saves the World

LATEST COMMENTS
  • The Customer-Centered Innovation Map by Ellen Domb
  • All Solutions Are Not Equal by Ellen Domb
  • Teaching Innovation by mike Lafond
  • The Customer-Centered Innovation Map by Navneet Bhushan
  • Dogwood in the Moonlight by Lynda Curtin
  • Dogwood in the Moonlight by Ellen Domb

COMMENTATORS
Katie Barry [40]  RSS Katie Barry's Biography
Ellen Domb [36]  RSS Ellen Domb's Biography
Praveen Gupta [34]  RSS Praveen Gupta's Biography
Michael S. Slocum [33]  RSS Michael S. Slocum's Biography
Cass Pursell [27]  RSS Cass Pursell's Biography
James Todhunter [16]  RSS James Todhunter's Biography
Jack Hipple [13]  RSS Jack Hipple's Biography
Michael Cyger [10]  RSS Michael Cyger's Biography
Lynda Curtin [7]  RSS Lynda Curtin's Biography
Bob Carter [4]  RSS Bob Carter's Biography
Guest Commentator [3]  RSS Guest Commentator's Biography
All Commentators

CATEGORIES
About Commentators [10]  RSS
Buzz/Press [40]  RSS
Companies [16]  RSS
Conference [37] RSS
General [95]  RSS
Leadership [4]  RSS
Management [45]  RSS
Methodology [61]  RSS
Strategy [60]  RSS

ARCHIVES
RSS
  

* Current Month
* Full Archive



Ad Links
Design for Six Sigma eLearning

TRIZ training, business & technical applications

Innovation programs from BMG

Business Innovation in the 21st Century (eBook)

Innovaton-TRIZ


Legal Information. © 2006 CTQ Media LLC. All rights reserved. v1.0, 0.1 Submit an Article • About The TRIZ Journal • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Site Map